Closed mpeuster closed 6 years ago
Indeed. And these package_file_id
and package_file_name
fields could possibly be part of the overall approach to those mappings, instead of a black sheep in a flock of white ones...
Yes.
In fact these fields are:
"package_file_name": "5gtango-ns-package-example.tgo",
"package_file_uuid": "d26e198c-fdb9-4bdf-ae91-b289605ab838",
Full example of a PD: https://gist.github.com/mpeuster/34c6b0d968ce2e079a846e0f903989a0
Lets annotate our package descriptors uploaded to the catalogue so that we do not need the mapping endpoint anymore.
Makes the design mich clearer. (We annotate UUIDs to the files anyhow. )