Closed jordisala1991 closed 3 years ago
It's not clear to me: If this big to-do-list couldn't be finished (quickly/in time), what is required for a new alpha or the stable version ?
Would be nice for the stable version, but not mandatory. To be noted that some of this will break bc, so if we do it after the stable, will need to be done for 5.0.
For example:
Is it mandatory to have admin lte v3 to release sonata admin v4 stable? Not to me, it would be nice but not mandatory. If we don't get there in time, it will have to wait for 5.0 (or done in a bc way)
Is it mandatory to have admin lte v3 to release sonata admin v4 stable? Not to me, it would be nice but not mandatory.
If I remember correctly, Admin-lte v3 seems to be a huge change because it will use bootstrap 4 instead of 3. So all the css written in the admin pages by the developper will need to be rewritten. There is already a lot of change for the v4. So IMHO it's better to do it for the v5.
I'm ok to release the stable v4 in 1-2 month and to release the v5 at the end of the year. We should release a new major every year after the v4 to avoid this situation again.
Im okay with not upgrading admin-lte for v4.
This issue is about making changes that bring value and not blocking releases or try to upgrade a lot of things in a single PR.
We have a problem with this dependency: Eonasdan dateTime picker
It is installed here (previously it was on core-bundle), but the date form types are actually in https://github.com/sonata-project/form-extensions/tree/1.x/src/Type (they were previously on core-bundle too)
We have at least 3 solutions here:
The only thing with the third option is that we need to configure webpack encore there too.
Edit: To be noted that the eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker
is deprecated for tempusdominus-bootstrap-4
, but that should be another story because it requires bootstrap 4 and we are not there yet.
wdyt? Maybe there are other options I didn't thought about. @sonata-project/contributors
I have installed bootsratp 4 for the front of my project with webpack and I'm using "tempusdominus-bootstrap-4": "^5.1.2" with
->add('deliveryDate', DatePickerType::class, [
'required' => false,
'widget' => 'single_text',
'html5' => true,
'format' => 'd.M.y',
'attr' => [
'data-toggle'=>"datetimepicker",
'data-target'=>"#castingbundle_actorrequest_deliveryDate"
],
'datepicker_use_button' => false,
'dp_days_of_week_disabled' => [0,6],
'dp_min_date' => $date->format('Y-m-d\TH:i:s'),
'dp_use_current' => false,
'dp_show_today' => true,
'dp_max_date' => $maxdate->format('Y-m-d\TH:i:s'),
'dp_pick_date' => true
])
and I'm rendering it with {{ form_row(form.deliveryDate) }}
And it works.
I don't know if this is helpful for your problem but I'm just pointing out that it works with the picker type
I have installed bootsratp 4 for the front of my project with webpack and I'm using "tempusdominus-bootstrap-4": "^5.1.2" with
->add('deliveryDate', DatePickerType::class, [ 'required' => false, 'widget' => 'single_text', 'html5' => true, 'format' => 'd.M.y', 'attr' => [ 'data-toggle'=>"datetimepicker", 'data-target'=>"#castingbundle_actorrequest_deliveryDate" ], 'datepicker_use_button' => false, 'dp_days_of_week_disabled' => [0,6], 'dp_min_date' => $date->format('Y-m-d\TH:i:s'), 'dp_use_current' => false, 'dp_show_today' => true, 'dp_max_date' => $maxdate->format('Y-m-d\TH:i:s'), 'dp_pick_date' => true ])
and I'm rendering it with
{{ form_row(form.deliveryDate) }}
And it works.I don't know if this is helpful for your problem but I'm just pointing out that it works with the picker type
What version of eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker
do you use?
What version of
eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker
do you use?
none
Oh you replaced eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker
with tempusdominus-bootstrap-4
.
Still I don't know if all options of our base date time types are compatible with that package. (Also to be noted that we are still using bootstrap 3 here because of admin-lte v2).
The problem that I am trying to point out is that we are installing a package that gives a features used in another library and that's a problem when trying to upgrade things.
My fear about upgrading this package is this PR: https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataCoreBundle/pull/149
Edit: Now that I see it, most of the changes comes from the fact that it is using bower and replacing a lot of files that are not ours. Adding a third option...
can we maybe remove those options from form-extensions
and add them from here with a Form Type Extension? like EonasdanDatePickerTypeExtension
or something like that.
can we maybe remove those options from
form-extensions
and add them from here with a Form Type Extension? likeEonasdanDatePickerTypeExtension
or something like that.
That could be a good thing to try, but not sure about this: https://github.com/sonata-project/form-extensions/blob/1.x/src/Bridge/Symfony/Resources/views/Form/datepicker.html.twig
If those form-extensions types are suposed to work standalone, I am missing something, because there is a coupling with some javascript but the bridge provides none.
If those form-extensions types are suposed to work standalone, I am missing something, because there is a coupling with some javascript but the bridge provides none.
oops, I thought the templates were here, in that case I guess we should also override them (and not sure how would look like in form-extensions
, maybe they won't exist).
If we remove those templates from the extension, how does it work when used standalone? Not sure about that.
@sonata-project/contributors wdyt?
A lot of the work required is already done or on PRs already opened. I just moved some tasks to second priority
A lot of the work required is already done or on PRs already opened. I just moved some tasks to second priority
We might take all the first round in 4.0 and set 5.0 milestone for the second round :)
A lot of the work required is already done or on PRs already opened. I just moved some tasks to second priority
We might take all the first round in 4.0 and set 5.0 milestone for the second round :)
IMO we should consider integration with webpack encore bundle in 4.0. Then other things from second round can be done in 4.x as experimental another encore build.
I have listed what Githubissues.
Feature Request
We recently moved to NPM to handle all the dependencies of our code: https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataAdminBundle/pull/7034
First Round
components-font-awesome
for@fortawesome/fontawesome-free
(#7133)