jaspercb
commented
4 years ago Oh, and here's sample test output from when I cleared out sl_ascend_items.txt and ran the new error-handling code. I think the current error message isn't great, and would be thrilled to change it to something else. :)
Found dependency loop involving wad of dough when trying to craft moosemeat pie, consider adding to reserve list.
> Dependencies (in no particular order):
> > wad of dough
> > pie crust
> > flat dough
> > moosemeat pie
Posting this PR as a request for comment, since I'm still tweaking the weights on this.
Sample day 1 consumption in softcore standard:
sl_eaten = (1:Jarlsberg's key lime pie:129), (1:Sneaky Pete's key lime pie:129), (1:grue egg omelette:129), (1:meteoreo:129), (1:glass of raw eggs:129), (1:Hide-rox™ cookie:129)(3 pulls, for the two key lime pies and the grue egg omelette - this seems reasonable to me)sl_drunken = (1:splendid martini:50), (1:splendid martini:56), (1:splendid martini:63), (1:Third Base:71), (1:oily mushroom wine:75), (1:oily mushroom wine:91), (1:oily mushroom wine:91), (1:jug of booze:124)(3 pulls for 3 oily mushroom wines - this is a little pricy and seems like not a great move. Decreasing the limit on cost-per-inebriety would mitigate this (since mushroom wines are expensive), or we could increase the penalty for "adventures from pulling" from -7 to -10 or something even larger.)EDIT: Closes #308 (guards pullXWhenHaveY with "if we have one in storage already")