soonaverse / app

The Soonaverse - Web3 platform for communities build on IOTA & Shimmer
https://soonaverse.com
Apache License 2.0
13 stars 10 forks source link

Ability to stake multiple NFTs at once #23

Closed epochzro closed 1 year ago

epochzro commented 1 year ago

Staking NFTs would be much smoother if all could be done from soonaverse. sending to shimmer only to have to send it back to soon so soon can send it back to shimmer seems like a bit of hoop jumping. Onother option would be to open one stake address and all nfts sent to this address get staked with the parameters selected when opening the address.

Some users are staking over 100 nfts, if each stake takes on average 2 minutes... well you get the point ;)

adamunchained commented 1 year ago

This is problematic as we wouldn't want to hold locked assets in our custody hence we don't allow it. This is something we might enable once Firefly allows us to send multiple NFTs at once. Would you be able to raise request with them and link it here?

epochzro commented 1 year ago

There is no need to hold the nft, just send it back in a locked state as you receive it.   I send 1 at a time to the same receiving address.

On Fri., May 12, 2023, 09:37 a.m. Adam @.***> wrote:

This is problematic as we wouldn't want to hold locked assets in our custody hence we don't allow it. This is something we might enable once Firefly allows us to send multiple NFTs at once. Would you be able to raise request with them and link it here? —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.> [ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/soonaverse/app/issues/23", "url": "https://github.com/soonaverse/app/issues/23", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.***": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

adamunchained commented 1 year ago

Right, so what you're saying you want to be able to reuse receiving address?

epochzro commented 1 year ago

That would speed up the process for sure

On Fri., May 12, 2023, 10:08 a.m. Adam @.***> wrote:

Right, so what you're saying you want to be able to reuse receiving address? —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.> [ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/soonaverse/app/issues/23", "url": "https://github.com/soonaverse/app/issues/23", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.***": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

Stale issue, closing!