Closed ghost closed 2 years ago
Upon quick inspection, appears to be a regression introduced by #28.
Going to leave this for when I (or whoever) wants to make a test suite, because I'm tired of always forgetting to check one or another kind of link(s) in Regex101 before implementing changes.
@half-duplex kindly pointed out that the original, unsimplified implementation of #28 didn't have this problem, so that's a decent starting point.