Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Instead of a language.ini file? I think language.ini is less hassle for most
people.
We could, of course, compile it inside, but let's bring that to the forums.
Original comment by r-...@live.com
on 4 Jun 2010 at 7:33
many people, for example, use channels and a WBFS HDD
Original comment by rvmn95
on 4 Jun 2010 at 9:11
please add this, i want to use a channel, but not in English
better in Spanish would also pleaseee!
Original comment by sataniel...@hotmail.com
on 19 Jun 2010 at 11:51
It would help me, i use an WBFS HDD and i havent an SD, so i use a channel. It
is every time in english and i want spanish
Original comment by rafacamp...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2010 at 11:57
dont use wbfs then. It is obsolete anyway and not as good. With fat32
everything can be on a hard drive and works fine. Putting Languages into the
dol would make updating the languages too cumbersome.
Original comment by Miigotu
on 20 Jun 2010 at 12:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rvmn95
on 26 Mar 2010 at 9:10