sorted01 / Filametrix

This is a mod of the Voron Stealthburner which adds a filament cutting possibility!
332 stars 44 forks source link

Solution for the gantry mounted part for people with extrusion backers? #11

Closed erazor666 closed 10 months ago

erazor666 commented 11 months ago

any ideas on how to attach the gantry part of the cutter mod when you have extrusion backers on your Y axis? I really want to keep them and use this mod :(

o1hitman1o commented 11 months ago

I would say is it possible to put the backers on the exterior side instead of the top? I don't have the backers installed myself but if it will fit I would think on the side would offer the same performance as on the top.

erazor666 commented 11 months ago

I would think the backers will not have the optimum performance of counteracting the bi-metallic effect that they are there for if the are not on oposite sides :)

I guess that it is quite possible to design something in Fusion360 when I get a free minute. Was just looking for the possibility that someone else had this same issue :)

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

I would think the backers will not have the optimum performance of counteracting the bi-metallic effect that they are there for if the are not on oposite sides :)

I guess that it is quite possible to design something in Fusion360 when I get a free minute. Was just looking for the possibility that someone else had this same issue :)

I am working on this design. Does anyone happen to know how far over the center of the 2020 should be in relation to the back edge of the backer? I have everything designed but need to set the relationship between the 2020 extrusion and the back of the part

This will use a 1.25" (original 40mm will just stick up slightly longer) length of 2020 that is pushed over the t-slot profiles and screwed down with an M5x8mm FHCS (or longer if you want to tap your profile deeper) from underneath the bracket and 2x M3x8mm SHCSs pin it at the top. Then uses the back two screws of the extrusion backer to secure it to the gantry with 2x M3x8mm SHCSs (Assuming 3.2mm backers)

Something like this: image

erazor666 commented 11 months ago

I guess people have different backers, I myself am using the rails of my old MGN9's that used to be on my V2 X axis. since they were rather useless after converting to MGN12 on the X rail. There are some premade backers that are titanium and such, dont know if they have same screw hole pattern as a MGN rail. What are you basing the design on? From a purely visual standoint this seems very much the way to go. (and the way I was doing it on my napkin design ) :)

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

It's my own design from scratch, I have titanium backers that I am designing around but I do not have them installed yet, which is why I was wondering about the positioning. The titanium backers have 40mm hole spacing and they have varied distances from the edge of the backer 5-20mm based on the build size. I do not know the hole spacing on the MGN9 rails and that may or may not be standard across rails. If it helps, when I finish the design I could share the step or native Solidworks file for you to modify to your needs, likely you would just need to change the overall height and the hole spacing and relationship to the edge.

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

I took some measurements and figured it out and adjusted the CAD. I had to make it wider because the backer hole aligned under the 2020 piece. I also made a 250, 300 & 350 build version. Here is the 300 version. image

SLDPRT, STEP & STL files attached. :) Print/modify at your own risk, I have not done any sort of testing or printing of any of this yet. I am waiting on parts to build this up along with several other mods, so I won't get around to testing for several weeks. 2020_mounts_ti_backer.zip

erazor666 commented 11 months ago

I will have a look at this in the afternoon, it looks like the way to go very much. Hole spacing on a MGN9 is 20mm it seems from measuring. Probably this would be worthwhile to do a pull request on eventually, there are many people who use backers (and should)

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

If your hole spacing is 20mm then this should work for you as well.

I printed one of these last night since my printer wasn't running, I have some tweaks to make before I'd say this is ready to go. The t-slot profile needs more clearance and I want to tighten up the holes at the top because the screws don't quite bite enough to my liking, maybe add a gusset or to to stiffen it up.

I might design a full 3D printed part to make this a little cleaner, I am not sure how much force it takes, but given the lever arm thickness, it can't be that much.

I'll see where I get on this today, I think it will still need a build size variant of each unless I make it slotted with some notches to align the screws to.

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

This is what I have come up with this morning as a 2 piece design. The mount spacing is 40mm and it has 10mm slots, so it can be adjusted front to back 5mm from nominal, which is the difference between the 250, 300 & 350 build sizes. For titanium backers, it should be aligned with the back of the backer. The BHCS is an M3x16mm and is adjustable in and out with a nut to lock it in place and depress the lever, this could be SHCS as well, I just like the idea of a rounded head to interface. The screw mounting the two pieces is an M3x8mm FHCS and it's in a slot and adjustable up and down. The two pieces have grooves to index together to prevent movement and are adjustable in 2.4mm increments, so the farthest you could align from perfect would be 1.2mm, this seemed a reasonable tradeoff between keeping standard 0.4mm nozzle settings and requiring a finer nozzle to print the parts. For 3mm backers this uses M3x10mm SHCSs, for thicker backers like MGN9 rails, you'll have to compensate for the thickness with a longer screw. image image

I will try to print these tonight when I get home to see how they do in both printability and interfacing with each other and my backer, but will not be able to test with the actual filament cutter for several weeks. I will confirm they at least interface together and with the backer and then upload part files if they do and you're welcome to test them after that.

erazor666 commented 11 months ago

Awesome, that is much cooler than any design I would have come up with. Absolutely a PR worthy. :) Also the gantry piece as long as its located like the orignal one will probably work fine, its a passive part of of the cutter anyhow.

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

Here it is set in place, not actually mounted but just set where it would go. I adjusted the height to the original 40mm of the 2020 extrusion so this could work with or without backers, MGN9 backers could work as long as the hole spacing is 10/20/40mm and the first hole is 5-15mm from the back edge. 20230817_095739 20230817_095722 depressor.zip Correctly oriented ^

juliusjj25 commented 11 months ago

I created a pull request, I'll admit, I have no clue if I did it right though!

shaneshort commented 11 months ago

looks like this has been merged, should be ok to close the issue?

sorted01 commented 11 months ago

I merged it. Sorry was out for some time due to my baby 👶

WegnerDan commented 1 month ago

Would it be possible to add a step file for this depressor?