Closed zero00072 closed 8 years ago
Thank you so much for working on this DTD document! May I ask what you use to test the compliance with the syntax?
Also, are strings' movements (that you made in the beginning of xdxf_strict.dtd
) simply representational or they are prescribed by the standard?
Hello! Thanks to review. I found it because of that Goldendict references to this DTD standard.
I fixed it just for I want declare what the DTD's logic. I found something I can't understand, so I just push it to http://www.validome.org/grammar/ to validated it. And then I known what you defined and fixed some little loop problems.
It is not follow any standard but mirror the http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.dtd style to stylish your DTD. You can just cancel my changes about style and comments.
But the "def" tag have a loop so that I can't fix it. This may need to reconstruct your DTD logic.
It would be nice if you could leave only those changes that are important. Without stylishing, that is :) Thank you.
OK, give me hours. I will fixed it by only important thing based on your new push.
OK, I have fixed it without stylish.
Thank you very much! I fixed everything and made a lot of changes.
More follow DTD rules. It still have a DTD syntax error at the "def" element.