Closed mmuesly closed 3 years ago
This file originates from the good part of the original benchmark. In this example, there is no assertion violation expected. I made a mistake here.
[ ] programs added to new and appropriately named directory
[ ] license present and acceptable (in machine-readable comment at beginning of program as specified by the REUSE project)
[ ] contributed-by present (either in README file or as comment at beginning of program)
[ ] programs added to a .set file of an existing category, or new sub-category established (if justified)
.set
[ ] intended property matches the corresponding .prp file
.prp
[ ] programs and expected answer added to a .yml file according to task definitions
.yml
@peterschrammel or @sohah might you have a look on this proposal?
This file originates from the good part of the original benchmark. In this example, there is no assertion violation expected. I made a mistake here.
[ ] programs added to new and appropriately named directory
[ ] license present and acceptable (in machine-readable comment at beginning of program as specified by the REUSE project)
[ ] contributed-by present (either in README file or as comment at beginning of program)
[ ] programs added to a
.set
file of an existing category, or new sub-category established (if justified)[ ] intended property matches the corresponding
.prp
file[ ] programs and expected answer added to a
.yml
file according to task definitions