Open PhilippWendler opened 7 years ago
I support moving such benchmarks into the BitVectorsReach category, as you suggested. I could be wrong, but I think you could leave those files in their original folders, but just update set files.
Yes, not moving, but keeping the files close to their original and README and LICENSE.
Those files were added to a new .set file: https://github.com/sosy-lab/sv-benchmarks/blob/master/c/Overflows-Other.set
@PhilippWendler, just to make sure I correctly understood: You mean signed overflow, right? ("This year several tasks with unsigned overflows")
No, I meant unsigned overflows.
@PhilippWendler: Please propose action item.
Adding these files to another category is easy, but to remove them from the current category without removing them from the current directory is not so easy. How about creating a subdirectory for such files?
This year several tasks with unsigned overflows have been added to some categories, e.g., in #234.
In previous years, such tasks have been moved to the BitVectorsReach category and other categories have been kept mostly free of overflows.
Should this be done here as well? Otherwise, what is the reason for having a specific BitVectors category?
If we want to move the files, how do we organize them in the repository? Moving files between directories as has been done in the past is not good, because then the connection between readme, license, and source file is lost.