search

sot / astromon

Astrometric accuracy (celestial location) monitor
0 stars 0 forks source link

MTA page summary? #6

Open jeanconn opened 7 years ago

jeanconn commented 7 years ago

Should the mta page version have summary stats (green box) consistent with the plotted data on that page? Or a link to the CAL version of the page for summary?

taldcroft commented 7 years ago

Yes.

jeanconn commented 7 years ago

Yes to the first question?

jeanconn commented 7 years ago

I haven't looked much at the oaa4_snr4 data but 

In [11]: run calc_rms_mta.py
N srcs: 12660
RMS radius 0.942299165114
90 percentile radius = 1.72167643044 arcsec
99 percentile radius = 2.87514463621 arcsec
90 percentile radius for ACIS-S is 1.75065533792 arcsec
90 percentile radius for ACIS-I is 1.63002487421 arcsec
90 percentile radius for HRC-S is 1.83472442295 arcsec
90 percentile radius for HRC-I is 1.96099080376 arcsec
18.2 percent outside a 1 arcsec radius
Worst case is 3.0
taldcroft commented 7 years ago

We do need to be a little careful because there are a non-small fraction of misidentifications. Maybe including numbers in this page from the high-confidence identifications (i.e. the public page numbers) is the right way to go.

jeanconn commented 2 years ago

We had this old idea that the MTA page and the CAL page should share the "summary stats" values even if displaying different data. Don't know if this should apply to the work that @javierggt is doing.

javierggt commented 2 years ago

It applies. Will keep it in mind.