search

souldiver / open9x

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/open9x
0 stars 0 forks source link

Be able to choose both files idependentely on Voice "play both" feature #216

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Which board (stock / gruvin9x / sky9x) are you using?

Stock Board with Atmega 128

Be able to choose both files idependentely on Voice "play both" feature
I know that we can make copies of the existing files and reorder them with 
other numbers.. But it would be cleaner and less of a pain in the back side to 
be able to delect both files idependentely..  :)

I can see that display space is tight but maybe with a bit of good will :D 
could be done?

Thanks, Merci.  :)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by joaoalve...@googlemail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 12:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Too many limitations on the 9x. Especially the LCD size is not fine for that, 
or the screen will be horrible

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 12:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Oh well, it was just a cool idea that unfortunately doesn't go anywhere.. After 
all there are limitations.. :D  :)

Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 1:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
On the sky9x the PlayBoth is also impossible, we would have to choose between 2 
files, 6chars needed for each. We need a bigger screen for that.

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 1:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Yeah, here is just numbers.. it makes it smaller. we would just need to squeeze 
2 characters in..

ID0 Play BOTH  308/420

I think I've seen somewhere in the forum a screen where there was a speaker 
symbol.
Mybe with the little symbol we could have:

ID0  (Speaker Symbol) Both 308/420

The same for track as well of course.. 

THR (Speaker Symbol) TRACK  267

Then we wouldn't need the work play thus saving spave for what is needed :)

Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 2:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Oh, and maybe then there was enough space for the characters on the sky board 
as well :D

Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 2:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I really think it's an acceptable solution to have consecutive numbers for this 
function. LCD is a problem, EEPROM is another, I don't want to change the 
CustomFunction structure only for that ...

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 3:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Ok, yes, it is an acceptable solution, indeed much better than before. it just 
could be better. ;)
LCD would be solved with the symbol solution then, so it's out of the way :)
EEPROM, must all the boards have the same eeprom structure?? I do understand 
that this wouldn't be possible in all the boards..

I could easily find a few more reasons for you to change the custom function 
structure  ;)

No, Now seriously, it was just an idea. If it is not possible, or is too much 
trouble, I do understand.

Original comment by joaoalve...@googlemail.com on 22 Feb 2013 at 3:37