search

soundasleep / iaml

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/iaml
3 stars 1 forks source link

Define 'can save?' for Domain Attribute Instances #230

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What new or enhanced feature are you proposing?
Currently, 'can save?' is only defined for DomainIterators. This condition 
should be extended to DomainAttributeInstances.

What goal would this enhancement help you achieve?
More consistent metamodel, with respect to the design philosophy of Properties. 
That is, a DAI is not a Property because it may contain 
Operations/Conditions/Events.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by soundasleep on 21 Mar 2011 at 2:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Also, the 'save' operation is already defined for Domain Attribute Instances, 
but no converse 'can save?' condition is defined.

Original comment by soundasleep on 21 Mar 2011 at 2:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
mass tagging old issues to future work

Original comment by soundasleep on 26 Sep 2011 at 9:54