sourabhkt / robotframework-seleniumlibrary

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/robotframework-seleniumlibrary
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Selenium Library Features optimization #178

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi,

I would suggest 3 enhancements as below with Robot-Selenium library.

1.
Robot-Selenium library should provide option to upgrade Selenium. For e.g. it 
is providing Selenium 2 but and in future if Selenium 3 comes then user can 
directly upgrade Selenium 3 without waiting for newer version of Robot-SElenium 
library.

2. 
Data driven option of Selenium Library should be optimized like TestNG data 
provider. Currently it is not providing results as expected and not providing 
flexibility to get data from XML, DOM or csv and we need to create python 
function which consider complete data as string.

3. More friendliness should be provided in RIDE editor for looping and if 
because when there is more complexity requirement to test then user will not go 
every time in python code. Good programming option like .NET and Java in RIDE 
should be provided which helps to easily write complex test cases.

Thanks,
Santosh

Original issue reported on code.google.com by shvsant...@gmail.com on 22 Feb 2011 at 6:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This issue is invalid because it contains more than one feature request and 
most of them aren't SeleniumLibrary related. I comment the individual request 
below.

1) You can already now use whatever Selenium version you want. It's just matter 
of starting Selenium Server yourself. This is explained in 
InstallationInstructions wiki page.

2) All test data related features requests belong to Robot Framework's issue 
tracker.First of all, If you decide to submit this request there, please be 
more specific on what new functionality you want. Saying "like TestNG" doesn't 
really tell much.

3) All RIDE related feature requests belong to RIDE's issue tracker. You 
should, again, be more concrete with the new functionality you would want.

Original comment by pekka.klarck on 22 Feb 2011 at 5:13