Open luizirber opened 4 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 86.74%. Comparing base (
f621726
) to head (19a0ccd
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Comparing lirber/codspeed_python
(19a0ccd) with latest
(f621726)
⁉️ 21
dropped benchmarks
:warning: _Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed._
Benchmark | latest |
lirber/codspeed_python |
Change | |
---|---|---|---|---|
⁉️ | force with valid kmers |
13.9 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | invalid kmers |
10.3 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | lowercase |
13.9 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | valid |
13.9 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | force with valid kmers |
396.4 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | invalid kmers |
396.8 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | lowercase |
396.3 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | valid |
396.4 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | abund0_ani_ci0 |
560.5 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | abund0_ani_ci1 |
581.5 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | abund1_ani_ci0 |
770.9 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | abund1_ani_ci1 |
793.5 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | intersection |
18.2 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | intersection_size |
15.4 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | large intersection |
9.1 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | large intersection btree |
18 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | large intersection_size |
7.5 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | large intersection_size btree |
17.8 ms | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | load nodegraph |
187 µs | N/A | N/A |
⁉️ | save compressed nodegraph |
1.4 ms | N/A | N/A |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
:information_source: _Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks._
Follow-up on #3231 with Python perf tracking.
This uses pytest-benchmark instead of asv, but I'm still not sure that's a good idea, because pytest-benchmark doesn't track memory usage as asv does.