Open joe-hutchinson-cko opened 2 months ago
Using provider version 1.15 it appears as if the provider can't handle workerpool recreation properly and reports success when infact it did a noop.
To reproduce:
The provider will report it has recreated the worker pool which is odd given the UI states workerpools cannot be destroyed when referenced by a stack.
What I'd expect to happen when you taint a resource is the recreation is actually the provider doing a refresh of the workerpool.
Using provider version 1.15 it appears as if the provider can't handle workerpool recreation properly and reports success when infact it did a noop.
To reproduce:
The provider will report it has recreated the worker pool which is odd given the UI states workerpools cannot be destroyed when referenced by a stack.
What I'd expect to happen when you taint a resource is the recreation is actually the provider doing a refresh of the workerpool.