v0.3 Acceptance Criteria

[hcferguson]

Close high-priority issues: #470 #301 Close testing issues: #509, #510, #511, #512, #513, #514, #515 Create and pass unit tests for JWST data: #460 Screencasts & Screenshots: #300 #87

General items:

• [ ] Documentation satisfactory
• [x] Satisfactory user installation for release candidate
• [x] Satisfactory user loading of representative JWST level 3 data for MIRI MRS
• [x] Satisfactory user loading of representative JWST level 3 data for NIRSpec IFU
• [x] Known failures on loading non-JWST data are at least documented in readthedocs
• [ ] Intelligible error message on failures to load data

User testing of the following workflow:

• [x] Load a JWST data set
• [ ] Load a MANGA data set
• [x] Scrub through wavelength slices
• [x] Mouse-over quantities of flux, error & dq look sensible?
• [x] Select a spatial region. Does the 1D spectrum appear and does it look sensible?
• [x] Smooth the cube spatially
• [x] Smooth the cube in the spectral dimension
• [x] Test both viewers (split-image viewer and single-image viewer)
• [x] Create a first-moment map
• [x] Create a second-moment map (velocity)
• [ ] Create an emission-line map

[kassin]

How about adding to the workflow: create an emission line ratio map, change units, and save output line ratio map and first moment map.

[kassin]

It would also be useful to ask each tester: -what would they use CubeViz for? would they use it as is? -suggestions for additional functionality to be useful in their workflows -what do they like and not like about CubeViz, including UI

@SaOgaz Thoughts?

[SaOgaz]

I like these questions, I've passed them on to @javerbukh whose doing a user test session tomorrow.