Closed mustaric closed 3 years ago
Merging #40 (d6c937b) into master (d655b84) will increase coverage by
21.67%
. The diff coverage is83.33%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #40 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 61.27% 82.94% +21.67%
===========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 692 692
===========================================
+ Hits 424 574 +150
+ Misses 268 118 -150
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
exovetter/lpp.py | 74.86% <ø> (+62.90%) |
:arrow_up: |
exovetter/odd_even.py | 80.85% <80.00%> (ø) |
|
exovetter/vetters.py | 94.82% <100.00%> (+59.73%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d655b84...d6c937b. Read the comment docs.
@mustaric , is this ready for final review? Thanks!
I thought so, but I just thought of one more thing I wanted to do...hold on.
@pllim this is ready for your review In this pull request 1) Fixed issues with the odd_even test (median instead of average and a problem with the span for the out of transit cadences). I also improved the plotting. 2) Fixed the TCE problem in the second odd_even test. 3) Wrote a vetters test that runs odd_even, lpp and transit coverage. We can add more tests to this end-to-end as needed. 4) Commented out the extra lpp tests. If you agree I'll remove them and let test_vetters just do that piece of the testing.
Merged. Have a good weekend!
In this pull request I added a vetters test that tests LPP, Odd Even and transit coverage. I have also included a start to an example TCE notebook to show our current functionality to the users. In the process I fixed a couple of bugs in the odd-even vetter and brought the transit duration fraction up as an input to the function.