Closed mustaric closed 3 years ago
Merging #43 (e4606e3) into master (abd4b9b) will increase coverage by
0.46%
. The diff coverage is88.88%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #43 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.31% 81.78% +0.46%
==========================================
Files 13 14 +1
Lines 910 917 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 740 750 +10
+ Misses 170 167 -3
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
exovetter/lightkurve_utils.py | 70.00% <70.00%> (ø) |
|
exovetter/lpp.py | 74.86% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
exovetter/vetters.py | 97.18% <100.00%> (-0.12%) |
:arrow_down: |
exovetter/utils.py | 70.70% <0.00%> (+1.91%) |
:arrow_up: |
exovetter/sweet.py | 97.72% <0.00%> (+6.81%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update abd4b9b...e4606e3. Read the comment docs.
This pull request covers changes due to two things 1) i attempted using the code and had to make changes to the plots and some of the user interface (especially for sweet) to get it to work correctly. 2) I want to use the unreleased version of lightkurve in my pipeline to pull down the data. we will eventually have to support this for exovetter as well. So I created a python module with one function that makes the code agnostic to which lightkurve version we are using.