Closed t-brandt closed 3 months ago
Started a regression test run at https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1554 Theoretically we expect no changes in results, since this only addresses a potential corner case that does not currently exist in normal processing.
Attention: Patch coverage is 0%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 59.54%. Comparing base (
d668926
) to head (2b5828f
). Report is 465 commits behind head on master.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
jwst/extract_1d/extract1d.py | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Started a regression test run at https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1554 Theoretically we expect no changes in results, since this only addresses a potential corner case that does not currently exist in normal processing.
4 failures that are unrelated. So this looks OK.
Resolves JP-3660
Closes #8564
This PR fixes a bug/removes an unacknowledged assumption in _coalesce_bounds within extract1d.py, where incorrect bounds can be returned if several intervals are passed to the function to be combined, and one interval is entirely contained within another.
Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)
CHANGES.rst
within the relevant release section