bump min crds for build context

[braingram]

Increase the minimum required version of crds for "data-release-style" contexts.

Closes https://github.com/spacetelescope/jwst/issues/8876

Regression tests all pass: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/11800593788

Tasks

• [ ] request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
• [ ] add a build milestone, i.e. Build 11.3 (use the latest build if not sure)
• [ ] Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
  • [ ] write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
  • [ ] update or add relevant tests
  • [ ] update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
  • [ ] start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
  • [ ] Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
    • [ ] after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
• [ ] if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly

news fragment change types...

- ``changes/.general.rst``: infrastructure or miscellaneous change - ``changes/.docs.rst`` - ``changes/.stpipe.rst`` - ``changes/.datamodels.rst`` - ``changes/.scripts.rst`` - ``changes/.fits_generator.rst`` - ``changes/.set_telescope_pointing.rst`` - ``changes/.pipeline.rst`` ## stage 1 - ``changes/.group_scale.rst`` - ``changes/.dq_init.rst`` - ``changes/.emicorr.rst`` - ``changes/.saturation.rst`` - ``changes/.ipc.rst`` - ``changes/.firstframe.rst`` - ``changes/.lastframe.rst`` - ``changes/.reset.rst`` - ``changes/.superbias.rst`` - ``changes/.refpix.rst`` - ``changes/.linearity.rst`` - ``changes/.rscd.rst`` - ``changes/.persistence.rst`` - ``changes/.dark_current.rst`` - ``changes/.charge_migration.rst`` - ``changes/.jump.rst`` - ``changes/.clean_flicker_noise.rst`` - ``changes/.ramp_fitting.rst`` - ``changes/.gain_scale.rst`` ## stage 2 - ``changes/.assign_wcs.rst`` - ``changes/.badpix_selfcal.rst`` - ``changes/.msaflagopen.rst`` - ``changes/.nsclean.rst`` - ``changes/.imprint.rst`` - ``changes/.background.rst`` - ``changes/.extract_2d.rst`` - ``changes/.master_background.rst`` - ``changes/.wavecorr.rst`` - ``changes/.srctype.rst`` - ``changes/.straylight.rst`` - ``changes/.wfss_contam.rst`` - ``changes/.flatfield.rst`` - ``changes/.fringe.rst`` - ``changes/.pathloss.rst`` - ``changes/.barshadow.rst`` - ``changes/.photom.rst`` - ``changes/.pixel_replace.rst`` - ``changes/.resample_spec.rst`` - ``changes/.residual_fringe.rst`` - ``changes/.cube_build.rst`` - ``changes/.extract_1d.rst`` - ``changes/.resample.rst`` ## stage 3 - ``changes/.assign_mtwcs.rst`` - ``changes/.mrs_imatch.rst`` - ``changes/.tweakreg.rst`` - ``changes/.skymatch.rst`` - ``changes/.exp_to_source.rst`` - ``changes/.outlier_detection.rst`` - ``changes/.tso_photometry.rst`` - ``changes/.stack_refs.rst`` - ``changes/.align_refs.rst`` - ``changes/.klip.rst`` - ``changes/.spectral_leak.rst`` - ``changes/.source_catalog.rst`` - ``changes/.combine_1d.rst`` - ``changes/.ami.rst`` ## other - ``changes/.wfs_combine.rst`` - ``changes/.white_light.rst`` - ``changes/.cube_skymatch.rst`` - ``changes/.engdb_tools.rst`` - ``changes/.guider_cds.rst``

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 63.68%. Comparing base (0659b9c) to head (84bc6e2). Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #8950 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 63.68% 63.68% ======================================= Files 375 375 Lines 38691 38691 ======================================= Hits 24640 24640 Misses 14051 14051 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[braingram]

Closing and reopening as PR isn't pickup up push to source branch.

[braingram]

Closing and reopening again since now the CI is failing to run.... No clue what's up with github and this PR.

[braingram]

Oops, I mistakenly commented on this PR about "okifying". There's no regtest differences for this PR #8958 is the one that will need okifying.