Closed mperrin closed 1 year ago
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
8ab6627
) 74.78% compared to head (f657e96
) 74.78%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
I want to tag @douglase to review this, but for some reason GitHub is still not letting me, even after adding (re-adding?) @douglase to the collaborator list for this project.
I want to tag @douglase to review this, but for some reason GitHub is still not letting me, even after adding (re-adding?) @douglase to the collaborator list for this project.
@mperrin - it looks like he has a pending invite. Once he accepts I think you'll be able to assign him.
Very belatedly (but in prep for an upcoming release): @douglase could you please review this minor PR? It's about that failing test that we discussed back in Feb
Workaround for #552, about a test
test_Circular_Aperture_PTP_short
which is known to fail for scikit-image recent versions such as 0.19.3. See comment from @douglase in #552.For now, let's just skip that test for scikit-image more recent than version 0.18 which is known to work. This is implemented with pytest skipif. TBD sometime later to debug why the version change of skikit-image matters, and what to do about it.