Closed emolter closed 7 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
d3fce42
) 64.84% compared to head (264bb2d
) 64.84%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I am working on JP-3465 but it isn't ready yet; here's a link to the draft PR.
@braingram This keyword will be populated by SDP code during level-1b processing, just like all the other time-related keywords. There is an existing JSDP ticket to compute the value and populate it, and a JWSTKD ticket to add the definition to the official JWST keyword dictionary. So all bases are covered.
All the CI failures seem to be due to the same test "test_crds_selectors_vs_datamodel[miri]" and appear to be having a problem with model.meta.exposure.ngroups. No idea why this change would be causing that failure. I've checked the new lines in the core.schema.yaml lines closely and I don't see any syntax errors that would cause other failures in the schema.
All the CI failures seem to be due to the same test "test_crds_selectors_vs_datamodel[miri]" and appear to be having a problem with model.meta.exposure.ngroups. No idea why this change would be causing that failure. I've checked the new lines in the core.schema.yaml lines closely and I don't see any syntax errors that would cause other failures in the schema.
This was caused by a CRDS update that didn't have a matching datamodel update, addressed in #249.
Resolves JP-3449
Closes [spacetelescope/jwst#8036]
This PR addresses adding TMEASURE to the JWST core schema.
Checklist
CHANGES.rst
(either inBug Fixes
orChanges to API
)