spacetelescope / stsynphot_refactor

Synthetic photometry using Astropy for HST and JWST
http://stsynphot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
13 stars 10 forks source link

Remove test_phoenix_gap because all gaps now seemingly filled #174

Closed pllim closed 1 year ago

pllim commented 1 year ago

Description

Test added for #44 no longer emits expected warning. I think gaps are filled.

xref https://github.com/spacetelescope/pysynphot/issues/68#issuecomment-1402438980

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 84.85% // Head: 84.66% // Decreases project coverage by -0.19% :warning:

Coverage data is based on head (51488b7) compared to base (2cccc65). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #174 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 84.85% 84.66% -0.19% ========================================== Files 13 13 Lines 1637 1637 ========================================== - Hits 1389 1386 -3 - Misses 248 251 +3 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/spacetelescope/stsynphot_refactor/pull/174?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spacetelescope) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [stsynphot/catalog.py](https://codecov.io/gh/spacetelescope/stsynphot_refactor/pull/174?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spacetelescope#diff-c3RzeW5waG90L2NhdGFsb2cucHk=) | `95.57% <0.00%> (-2.66%)` | :arrow_down: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spacetelescope). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spacetelescope)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.