Test code coverage discussion (Codecov vs Coveralls)

spacetelescope / style-guides

An opinionated guide on how we work.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

55 stars 33 forks source link

Test code coverage discussion (Codecov vs Coveralls) #85

Closed brechmos-stsci closed 5 years ago

brechmos-stsci commented 5 years ago

There has been some discussion about test code coverage and it seems like something that should be included in each repository. There are many options but these two seem to be the most common at the institute. It appears that Codecov is a bit better with integration and setup etc. So, this is an opinionated suggestion that it should be included as part of the automated CI for each GitHub repository.

brechmos-stsci commented 5 years ago

@stscicrawford You good with this, can I merge? We have switched over to codecov in DATB as coveralls was giving issues and codecov was much easier to setup.