First of all, thanks for your amazing spam blocking service, and the many ways you guys provide to integrate with it :-)
I've noticed that unfortunately there are more providers, beyond SpamHaus, that use rspamd.local.lua to store their rules. I noticed that in the worst possible way, i.e. copying the rules as per instructions on the README... overwriting what I already had :-)
Fortunately I had backups, of course, but it might be nice to add a line just to give fair warning about the possibility of pre-existing files with the same name; the reverse is of course also true, people should pay close attention when using other services that also have a rspamd.local.lua file, lest they overwrite the SpamHaus configuration!
The alternative, of course, would be to add a file with a unique name, e.g. rspamd-spamhaus.local.lua, but I suspect this would require a bit more tweaking elsewhere...
Hi there,
First of all, thanks for your amazing spam blocking service, and the many ways you guys provide to integrate with it :-)
I've noticed that unfortunately there are more providers, beyond SpamHaus, that use
rspamd.local.lua
to store their rules. I noticed that in the worst possible way, i.e. copying the rules as per instructions on the README... overwriting what I already had :-)Fortunately I had backups, of course, but it might be nice to add a line just to give fair warning about the possibility of pre-existing files with the same name; the reverse is of course also true, people should pay close attention when using other services that also have a
rspamd.local.lua
file, lest they overwrite the SpamHaus configuration!The alternative, of course, would be to add a file with a unique name, e.g.
rspamd-spamhaus.local.lua
, but I suspect this would require a bit more tweaking elsewhere...