Closed arihantdaga closed 6 years ago
please sent me the code used so i can test it. you can sent it to my e-mail spaniakos@gmail.com
thank you
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:46 PM, arihant daga notifications@github.com wrote:
Step 1 . i did do_aes_encrypt(). Step 2. base64 encode the obtained cipher.
Then on the obtained cipher i did base64_decode(). then i did do_aes_decrypt() with the base64 decode cipher and iv obtained in previous steps. the resultint plain text obtained from this is of length 80 while the plain text used before Step 1 was only 76 characters long.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnM6sOk8-wvsepRbfQmcOkNsCiS3Azhks5sP7ysgaJpZM4Oepj9 .
There is one more bug now.. Encrypting and decrypting of this message results into this- {"temphumid":"12,12"} -> encrypt -> decrypt again -> {"temphumid":"12,12"?⸮⸮⸮ It also happens if i have 2 consecutive "}}" in the end of the string. I have emailed you @spaniakos
iteresting , what board are you using?
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 8:51 AM, arihant daga notifications@github.com wrote:
There is one more bug now.. Encrypting and decrypting of this message results into this- {"temphumid":"12,12"} -> encrypt -> decrypt again -> {"temphumid":"12,12"?⸮⸮⸮ It also happens if i have 2 consecutive "}}" in the end of the string
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17#issuecomment-318806759, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnM6tWOujUv4l0yPMaANlvPvFuA2rOHks5sSshtgaJpZM4Oepj9 .
ESP8266 12E
as expected. there is a bug with ESP8266. I bought mine a couple fo days ago, but i am leaving for vacation in some days.
by the end of august i will fully support ESP8266
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:25 AM, arihant daga notifications@github.com wrote:
ESP8266 12E
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17#issuecomment-318964282, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnM6oAtNXartObRflJlUa4VbkHpOW87ks5sTVdQgaJpZM4Oepj9 .
@spaniakos Any Updates on it bro ?
Sunday i finish my vacations. Shortly after i will publish an update.
On Aug 17, 2017 9:51 AM, "arihant daga" notifications@github.com wrote:
@spaniakos https://github.com/spaniakos Any Updates on it bro ?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17#issuecomment-322984466, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnM6tdCu9l-zZq01HhQQ8kaNMRauV4Gks5sY-LrgaJpZM4Oepj9 .
Is there a formula to predict max cipher size for a given length of message ? For example if in the following code i dont have to use buffer of size 1000 instead i can allocate buffer based on the msg size. ?
void encryptMsg(const char* msg, char data_encoded[],char iv_encoded[]){
char b64data[200];
byte cipher[1000];
....
...
}
AES has the same size of input and output.
Edit: Just to clarify, what I mean is the AES is expected to have the same size of input + padding = output.
@yhua537 What do u mean by size of input and output.. ? Input and out to do_aes_encrypt() or do_aes_decrypt() ? Can u explain ur situation better ?
I would need a sample code and output in order to comment on that.
Thank you
On Sep 10, 2017 20:18, "arihant daga" notifications@github.com wrote:
@yhua537 https://github.com/yhua537 What do u mean by size of input and output.. ? Input and out to do_aes_encrypt() or do_aes_decrypt() ? Can u explain ur situation better ?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17#issuecomment-328357360, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnM6jc_iDkLnzaa_-2QeRAY2_h6YwFIks5shBnYgaJpZM4Oepj9 .
Any Update on the this... ? The issue still persists...
I think the issue is somewhat with the code only.. Closing for now..
no updates as i am still traveling for some work... There have been some long months, but by the end of the week i return to my base station (Home)! :D thank you for your patience.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:25 PM, arihant daga notifications@github.com wrote:
Closed #17 https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spaniakos/AES/issues/17#event-1371198779, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnM6pBvSlpt9x9C-9FRf-yQWp2OovjOks5s9EcigaJpZM4Oepj9 .
Step 1 . i did do_aes_encrypt(). Step 2. base64 encode the obtained cipher.
Then on the obtained cipher i did base64_decode(). then i did do_aes_decrypt() with the base64 decode cipher and iv obtained in previous steps. the resultint plain text obtained from this is of length 80 while the plain text used before Step 1 was only 76 characters long. this is causing further issues when my decoded string looks like this {"my message"} ????.