Closed SumilThakr closed 6 years ago
Please take a look.
Coverage remained the same at 67.473% when pulling 2268a1fefb2b42974aaf04ebafdb89abbb33251e on SumilThakr:master into eed892c0e4bc44481e0d5464eb9b51b396442169 on spatialmodel:master.
Thanks! Can you also delete this line and the one after it, which were a worse way to achieve the same goal?
Thanks
Please take a look.