Open jlovejoy opened 3 weeks ago
see https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/296
http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/src/libpng-LICENSE.txt is the URL for both libpng-2.0 and Libpng
libpng-2.0
Libpng
the first part/license:
the second part/license:
BUT over the years, various things were updated such as the list of names and references to version numbers (which would be replaceable by SPDX matching guidelines, but need markup added) More substantial text changes occurred as well:
libpng-2.0 was added in Nov 2018, which also altered some of the text order, see https://github.com/pnggroup/libpng/commit/e79085a1724ccc5526dc752f6a696b3a94ef8cfa
question is for SPDX now: should these various changes over the years be handled with markup or constitute a new license?
see https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/296
http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/src/libpng-LICENSE.txt is the URL for both
libpng-2.0
andLibpng
the first part/license:
libpng-2.0
(and this is the URL is referenced in the SPDX entry) which was added for version 3.5 in 2019the second part/license:
BUT over the years, various things were updated such as the list of names and references to version numbers (which would be replaceable by SPDX matching guidelines, but need markup added) More substantial text changes occurred as well:
libpng-2.0
was added in Nov 2018, which also altered some of the text order, see https://github.com/pnggroup/libpng/commit/e79085a1724ccc5526dc752f6a696b3a94ef8cfaquestion is for SPDX now: should these various changes over the years be handled with markup or constitute a new license?