Open bact opened 2 weeks ago
I wonder if I should go ahead and setup the 3.0.1 redirects now since they are live.
We should probably wait for the 3.0 redirects until final release.
@kestewart @bact @zvr - thoughts?
Ideally, for 3.0.1 (Items 1-4) we should wait until the final release.
For 3.0.0 (Items 5-8), they are broken* now and need to be fixed by modifying redirections at spdx.org (5a-8a) together with PR #1109 (5b-8b).
*Broken here means the version in URL and the version in the content are not matched. This made, for example, our validator failed.
Just saw a slack message on 3.0.0 being broken - so I'll go ahead and merge #1109 and setup the redirects. I'll leave the 3.0.1 and 3.0 redirects until after release.
Redirects for 3.0.0 (Items 5-8) are in place and PR #1109 has been merged.
It may take some time for the changes to propagate we may need to clear our browser caches for it to take effect.
Thank you. I will try and report.
I'll leave the 3.0.1 and 3.0 redirects until after release.
Agree.
Confirmed
https://spdx.org/rdf/3.0.0/spdx-context.jsonld is now redirected to https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0.0/rdf/spdx-model.ttl
Browser cached may needed.
3.0.0 validation is good now.
3.0.1 validation is waiting for Items 1-4. (Validation CI will get updated by #1111)
I wonder if I should go ahead and setup the 3.0.1 redirects now since they are live.
We should probably wait for the 3.0 redirects until final release.
@goneall I have changed my mind.
We may need 3.0.1 redirects now to pass the validation.
3.0 can be wait until after 3.0.1 actually release.
I wonder if I should go ahead and setup the 3.0.1 redirects now since they are live. We should probably wait for the 3.0 redirects until final release.
@goneall I have changed my mind.
We may need 3.0.1 redirects now to pass the validation.
3.0 can be wait until after 3.0.1 actually release.
All the 3.0.1 redirects are now in place - we just have the 3.0 redirects which we can do after the release.
Thank you Gary.
For 3.0.1:
--
For 3.0.0:
(URL lists based on https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/679#issuecomment-2032543594 )