Closed lumjjb closed 1 year ago
Really fix #208 :). We forgot to check for the opposite relationships (e.g. CONTAINS_BY and CONTAINED_BY are both considered the same and a new CONTAINS relationship shouldn't be added by shorthand field)
Really fix #208 :). We forgot to check for the opposite relationships (e.g. CONTAINS_BY and CONTAINED_BY are both considered the same and a new CONTAINS relationship shouldn't be added by shorthand field)