Open dwsinger opened 5 years ago
The kind of output we want to achieve is probably something like: http://files.florian.rivoal.net/edit-rec-sample/2020-05-01.html#principal-flow
The source markup might look something like
<p>This is the <del errata-id=e123>original</del><ins errata-id=e123>modified</ins> spec text.
<div class=errata id=e123>
A minimal change to the spec just to show what this would look like.
</div>
Probably not quite that, but you get the idea.
I think that linking to the issue(s) is also desirable (essential), as that enables readers to see and possibly contribute to the conversation.
Well, we've formalized this in the Process, and there's proposed updates in tr-design now also, see http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/design/w3c-restyle/2020/readme#amendment
It would be great if errata and provisional updates could be maintained by highlights inline in the spec., in the sections to which they apply. Ideally, whether these are visible could be turned on/off. Errata visibility would help maintenance, I believe (and improves honesty with implementers).