Open sternk opened 10 years ago
Comment by till Migrated from http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/1110#comment:2
I think this workflow could be automated also (and maybe easier) for the CMDL interface. Hets would read in a whole script, process it, and output a modified script where the axioms used in proofs have been turned into "set axioms" statements. (This could even be added on top of Hets, using some scripting language.)
Reported by clange and assigned to ldiaconu Migrated from http://trac.informatik.uni-bremen.de:8080/hets/ticket/1110
I found that some provers (at least darwin and eprover) frequently report that they have used all axioms in my theory to prove some goal, whereas much fewer axioms should actually be needed, and SPASS does report using fewer axioms. Now, being interested in what axioms were really used, I manually ran the following workflow: