Closed didimitrie closed 6 years ago
Might be a good time to speak about versioning? Not sure if there's something in placed already.
For the builds/artifacts, I kind of like how Dynamo names them: {ProjectName}.{LatestEstableVersion}.{Timestamp}.{extension}
✅ speckleworks/speckleworks-website@310ddef1b65657b675a67878395d59e69f70edb6
@alvpickmans Sorry, closed this without addressing your comment. Displaying the actual artifact names on https://speckle.works/builds requires too many API calls so I just linked to the artifacts tab on the AppVeyor build page. Please go ahead and open another issue/bring this up on Slack if you want to discuss versioning for SpeckleDynamo :+1:
and this has been discussed previously, but not really implemented in plugins:
Server and Core are at 1.x.x
, but plugins not yet really. I think SpeckleRhino is waiting to get out of beta to get the 1.0.0
tag, and SpeckleDynamo too maybe?
@pearswj @didimitrie thanks for the input, I will have a read and keep the discussion on Slack if necessary
Since now we've got CI going for Dynamo (https://github.com/speckleworks/SpeckleDynamo/pull/23), we should add links to the build artefacts same as for SpeckleRhino.
This will obviously mean that later on we should take care on how we distribute the dynamo plugin - @teocomi added it to the package manager, we have the fresh builds from appveyor thanks to @pearswj and @alvpickmans, etc.