Open spoilerdo opened 2 years ago
I do think this is possible, but I don't think we would want to substitute the description for the name. For a parameterized test, we would loose the parameter info which is needed to point uniquely to the case. So that isn't an option.
So a best case might be something like name="TestMethodName(1, true) 'Description of the test'"
. I think this would often be awkwardly long, but whether or not it displays ok is probably down your CI platform. Are there examples where not having the description is a problem, or its just a nice to have?
If we made this change, it would need to cover the xunit and mstest equivalents.
nice to have
Hiii, I have the following question: Is it possible to have the NUnit descriptions available in a Junit test report as name? This would be cool to have as an extra option in the CLI.
Example of description: