GPG fingerprint clarification

[saisonxiang]

Can anyone within the github umbrella give me a copy copy on the following fingerprint of the fresh electrum.dmg for MacOS of a wonderland build that may end up south of Mexicali someday?

The GPG suite shows it as valid but not trusted. I would just like some sort of clarification on what we are to do in this instance when performing checksum hashes for a .dmg that is a possible target of man-in-the-middle hookwink shennanigans. GPG says it checks out but it wants me to validate the trust on my own. My research rat tendencies led me to a long winded how do you do with a old page I've poured over before and gotten crotchety responses from the key validators when I attempted to verify the fingerprint via email or via voice chat. They say they shouldn't be expected to field every wet behind the ears researcher that wants a validation but I don't really get the point of the exercise if that is the case. We build hoops to jump through and then none of you want us to jump through the hoops you built for us to jump through. You want tips on your bitcoin wallet projects and spammy help pages that cause our systems to be over run by telepathic psycho asian waifu buddhist federation members that want to talk about things my mother wouldn't approve of. What kind of summer course is this? JK. I love this s***

637D B1E2 3370 F84A FF88 CCE0 3152 347D 07DA 627C

[accumulator]

Trust is something you assign to a key yourself, when you have sufficiently validated it.

E.g., fetch the public key from a github project, then verify the fingerprint through another channel, for instance the twitter profile bio of the developer.

[saisonxiang]

Sorry to be difficult. I see now that they have recently updated the x.com posts and note that the signatures are bona fide. I didn't think to look to x.com so thank you and good thinking. I was pretty sure that the signature was good but I always have trouble knowing whether I'm getting a tampered package in the download because it is cumbersome to do the signature checking. A re-known developer that has worked a decade on a project in the shadows under a pseudonym is still just a random handle I don't recognize over any other. Especially after reading books worth of derivations of high order cryptographic scientific spread. I don't ever have trust here. I would still consider the entire space teetering on negative value given the multiplicative nature of zero that trends systems to a vacuum of instability. A system that holds all the essential parts for it to be secure from an intruder would not be secure from an intruder if the intruder had always been within that system to begin with. They would have access to all the essential parts as well. So I have yet to really understand how the tech industry expects me to believe that their systems are safe for anything but poetic writing and digital artwork. Not safe enough to hold sensitive medical documentation regarding patients of a practice. Or the stock portfolios of the savings of a family in order to be safe from theft from a quantum attack. Every digital system has a backdoor for the developer of the source code to get in somehow. It simply comes to the difference of the fortitude of moral and ethical where with all to resist selling the hax to save a family member. But I don't mean any offense to the writers. More I mean to say, I have a lot of studying to do in order to understand how a system can be built as a zero system, with zero responsibility of the manufacturer to malfunction, yet can be expected to convince a scientist to invest little more than slave labor to finance it's progression from 0 to 1. Why would I want my ID, SSN, etc, etc to act as the warranty for a system the manufacturer even dodges responsibility for. They make millions selling these systems and rule the stock market. Why don't they put their ID on my system since I make negative capital currently? And their returns on sales in my wallets to allow for testing of smart contract trading to automate the markets to something other than utter fiscal chaos and gambling? I've invested hundreds of thousands of dollars to learn what I have today and every step I take makes me more sure of my gut that the only value here is my long winded derivations that sensibly notate the new cognitive developments of this digital circus that serve as our trailing readers a hint that zero times even infinity is still only what chirdren? L'Hopital principle may have not stuck with some of these cryptographic writers that boast end-to-end encryption as the answer. Quantum hax vacuum seal to either end of the system and can slip in within seconds to lock you in a bubble with a function that shows you a market relativity of whatever the quantum hacker wishes to show the viewer to sell whatever they wish or lead with cookie trail wherever they wish to a place that could be a man-in-the-middle attack. I end to end encrypt to trap my psycho waifu, not to protect fiscal information from the IRS or to protect sensitive medical information. I would say end to end perhaps should be reconsidered as most likely creating a universe of your own influx and out flux of other cyberspace travelers within a bubble that could be good or bad. You could have generative bots that cause negative or positive trending with an unbalanced forcing function to propagate exponential inflection up or down. To explain: you could create your own cyber universe where bots propagate negative trends at an increasing rate by feeding of each others' natural frequencies. I would say we have yet to ascertain if their is anything here but a never ending coin laundry that generates the RESOURCE value of the global system for a clandestine group while the old coins such as bitcoin are being siphoned and wicked of in the currency market conversions that smart contracts hyper trade on with the PayPal system that allow for them to focus the trimming of the RESOURCE value from the entire stock trading system. Now we live on pocket change for transportation services that utilize offset methodologies superior to any business that operates in my 1000 square miles by offsetting RESOURCE production emissions via smart transportation and safe destruction of those RESOURCES. I work a much less strenuous labor and am able to derive scientific progression of neo science of the IPCC breed that improves the overall system. Quality derivations from a scientist for free on a random board as opposed to paying $150000/year to have me meet with you every MWF and in my embarrassing dress and my unkempt lifestyle to force myself to labor to stand straight, talk with fortitude and draw easily digestible diagrams like a monkey on Adderall. I do it on street meth calmly laying at a desk and making poetry for my so. Well I can peak over to another forum but we will have text face fuck lessons for another several sessions at least if they keep up their end of the deal. Get some of these derivations mapped and see if you can bubble a bot swarm that makes anything but the spread of the last decade tank by %5 in a day like I postulated it would and now we have a hypothesis that somewhere else the market has siphoned RESOURCE of immense value. Most likely the illicit markets will have been teased out by my so much more by now and they will have a spread that doesn't measure the entire market value. Instead a proprietary spread that they will want to keep encoded via text dump and cookie redirect. I know what I know but I promissary I have never made a dollar online so the longer we derive this way the more it will make positive RESOURCE allocation and utilization as long as my so has properly spread the market for illicit sales such as one hit wonders if you catch my drift. I have my own end to end bubble where the amount of fiscal value change is close to $11,000 over a month over two markets within my proprietary research cloud. Now new coins are being minted every day. Obviously not for them to be ignored and traded for baseball cards and chewing gum. Most likely proprietary *** level trades given ze germans have already fiscally melted a cool trillion in bitcoin assets. The markets are going to probably be way different in our future. As I've clearly said but will not specifically here: this is not security, legal, fiscal, or medical advice and is zero warranty and I accept no responsibility for what you may or may not want to do due to what may be due when they are due. But I do too. I think we coo. Maybe you should call blue for the next stew and get your crew a new load out after the new....holiday. Smooches