Closed emilelatour closed 7 years ago
That is correct for the current master branch, it's not an official release. I'm in the middle of a big refactor. Trying to finish up before UseR! 2017. I'll leave this open till all of this breakage is fixed.
Thank you for the poke. Sometimes that's all it takes. This is now fixed.
Awesome!! Thanks Shawn! Looking forward to trying out you package more!!
From: Shawn Garbett [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 7:42 AM To: spgarbet/tangram tangram@noreply.github.com Cc: Emile Latour latour@ohsu.edu; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [spgarbet/tangram] summary_table should be tangram (#24)
Thank you for the poke. Sometimes that's all it takes. This is now fixed.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/spgarbet/tangram/issues/24#issuecomment-311379984, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYOC9C5gMsaRWRqXOZ2K4XQZZYnPGxmHks5sIRSrgaJpZM4OGBnR.
I'm pushing towards the 0.3 release. Moving LaTeX and RTF rendering back to 0.3.1. It's important to get this refactor stable. CRAN check is now on documentation issues.
Hello,
I just want to point out that in your vignettes and examples, the function call
summary_table()
should betangram()
At least that's what I had to do for it to work