Hi, awesome package! RTF seems to work quite well, but found a bug when rendering categorical variables. In the Lancet example for instance, the output generated in HTML5 for sex is:
sex : female
418
139(90.3%)
However, if I do copy/paste to this editor I get this, % and then counts:
sex : female
418
90.3139
Similarly, in the RTF generated, same result:
sex : female
418
90.3%(139)
I further missed the corresponding superscript in the chi symbol, and the footnote. But for the rest, the generated word/rtf doc is very nice and ressembles HTML5 very well!
I'll look into this. I'm glad it worked for you. It's really amazing because I've ignored RTF for over a year and thought it was horribly broken at this point, and it was way down the list of priorities..
Hi, awesome package! RTF seems to work quite well, but found a bug when rendering categorical variables. In the Lancet example for instance, the output generated in HTML5 for sex is:
However, if I do copy/paste to this editor I get this, % and then counts:
Similarly, in the RTF generated, same result:
I further missed the corresponding superscript in the chi symbol, and the footnote. But for the rest, the generated word/rtf doc is very nice and ressembles HTML5 very well!
Cheers