Open jonascj opened 4 years ago
Although the packaging best-practices and tutorials at packaging.python.org are hated by many, they offer quite a few solutions: https://packaging.python.org/guides/single-sourcing-package-version/
I elaborated on the installation instructions in release-to-pypi.sh and I am bothered how much manual work is involed and how error-prone it is. Maybe github actions could be setup to do releases.
Anyway, a few times a year this method is still doable.
I recently set-up a working workflow to update my libs to pypi, it's based on conventional commits and github actions. It allows to do a release and a changelog in one go with 1 commit and 1 tag. If you are still interested I can build a PR
I just did release 0.9.2 to PyPi and the release procedure is error-prone. Less now than when I release 0.9.0 and 0.9.1, but still error-prone.
At the moment the version number has to be changed in
setup.py
andsphinxcontrib/images.py
manually.release-to-pypi.sh
(which does not interact with pypi.org) checks if the two version numbers match and it checks if the lightbox2 submodule is initialized. That is an improvement over the 0.9.0/0.9.1 jumble...When doing a test upload to test.pypi.org with twine you can only use any given version number for one test, so if you test with version
0.9.2
you can not retest with0.9.2
, but only with0.9.3
or0.9.2.pre2
. This error-prone, having to change version numbers (to add.preN
) to test on test.pypi.org and then have to change them back (and rebuild) before uploading to pypi.org...Of course it is doable, but I'm open for suggestions to make it less error-prone. Any ideas @t-b ?