Optimize upgrade CI, and use the self-built image in the release branch

[ty-dc]

Thanks for contributing!

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 81.12%. Comparing base (1c0cd94) to head (9c94365).

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/spidernet-io/spiderpool/pull/3632?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spidernet-io) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## release-v0.9 #3632 +/- ## ============================================= Coverage 81.12% 81.12% ============================================= Files 50 50 Lines 5373 5373 ============================================= Hits 4359 4359 Misses 856 856 Partials 158 158 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/spidernet-io/spiderpool/pull/3632/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spidernet-io) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/spidernet-io/spiderpool/pull/3632/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spidernet-io) | `81.12% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=spidernet-io#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

[ty-dc]

ci failed because there was no corresponding v0.9.4 chart, because 0.9.4 release failed.