Closed kousu closed 1 year ago
Despite my "fixes" claim, this doesn't yet deal with the acq-T1w
ambiguity (https://github.com/spine-generic/data-multi-subject/issues/103#issuecomment-969503450). Should we deal with that in this PR or in a follow up?
Drafted until it gets redone with mapping acq-T1w
-> flip-2_mt-off
: https://github.com/spine-generic/data-multi-subject/issues/103#issuecomment-969679915
@kousu @jcohenadad Can I take the lead on this PR since I addressed a series of other PRs in the last days? thanks
Fixed in #135 instead.
Before https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/99-appendices/09-entities.html#mt was standardized, we'd encoded this information in the acq field. But now we don't have to.
This was done with this script:
Fixes https://github.com/spine-generic/data-multi-subject/issues/103