Closed mguaypaq closed 7 months ago
Thanks for the push @mguaypaq!
I visually checked a few subjects in FSLeyes, and I also checked the orientation. The re-defaced images correspond with the original images 👍🏻
However, I noticed that some of the re-defaced images have changed intensity range:
$ cd data-multi-subject
# master branch
$ fslstats sub-fslAchieva02/anat/sub-fslAchieva02_T1w.nii.gz -R
0.000000 4022.933105
# mgp/redefaced branch
$ git fetch
$ git checkout mgp/redefaced
$ git pull && git annex get .
$ fslstats sub-fslAchieva02/anat/sub-fslAchieva02_T1w.nii.gz -R
0.000000 3219834.250000
The data type is the same for both:
# master branch
$ sct_image -i sub-fslAchieva02/anat/sub-fslAchieva02_T1w.nii.gz -header | grep data_type
data_type FLOAT64
# mgp/redefaced branch
$ sct_image -i sub-fslAchieva02/anat/sub-fslAchieva02_T1w.nii.gz -header | grep data_type
data_type FLOAT64
And both images look identical in FSLeyes. So I wonder if this is a problem.
Ultimately, I don't know whether the difference in intensity range is a problem. But, I did look at the old and new versions of sub-fslAchieva02/anat/sub-fslAchieva02_T1w.nii.gz
, and this is what I noticed:
descrip
header field is different, but probably not useful anyway (old: TE=3.6;Time=154907.020
, looks like metadata; new: 6.0.4:ddd0a010
, looks like a software version).
Images supplied by @renelabounek (thanks!)
Fixes #146.