Open calebschoepp opened 9 months ago
Is #86 potentially relevant here?
Is #86 potentially relevant here?
Yep, one more reason to want to support /scale
. IMO still not urgent though.
While I still don't think this is super urgent I'm kind of spinning my wheels looking for something to build so I'm going to assign myself here and take a crack at this issue.
This would allow the spin operator to handle the scaling of the underlying deployment and would obviate the need for
enableAutoscaling
field.