Closed flaport closed 9 months ago
Or is it because a PML is more memory intensive that the z-span needs to be reduced further?
No this is correct. Each layer of pml cost an additional layer of overhead in z.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023, 2:31 PM Floris Laporte @.***> wrote:
Or is it because a PML is more memory intensive that the z-span needs to be reduced further?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/spinsphotonics/fdtdz/issues/27#issuecomment-1843793388, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFQRGNLILGFZU2ORV4OLWTYIDW4TAVCNFSM6AAAAABAKDHOBKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNBTG44TGMZYHA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Thanks!
Hi! It's me again 🙂
Maybe I'm a little bit confused, but currently
fdtdz_jax
seems to require the pml parameterspml_kappa
,pml_sigma
andpml_alpha
to be of shape128-sum(pml_widths)
. is this correct? I would expect these pml parameters to extend all the way to the edges of the z-space.