Open rurkss opened 1 year ago
Hi @ese ! Firstly, thank you to Spotahome for open-sourcing this project and to those who maintain and contribute to it. We’ve adopted it at my company and it has been very useful.
There are, however, several points where we have had to make modifications. This PR is one of them, but absent any feedback here or on several other open PRs from other contributors we have become demotivated to submit them all upstream. We’re now at the point where we need to decide if we’re going to put effort into getting all of our modifications integrated upstream or formalise our fork.
In order to help us make this decision, I’m interested in understanding more about the governance of this project and what contributors should plan for in terms of reviews and merges. Do the maintainers have time available to review unsolicited contributions or is the intent for the project to be more of a publication? Is there some mode of collaboration that you would like for contributors to follow to facilitate integrating proposed changes?
Thanks for your work on this project and for your attention here, it’s most appreciated.
the point of this PR is to make redis-operator work inside of a namespace