Closed nemo83 closed 7 years ago
Pretty sure using JNI is the plan. https://github.com/yonromai/annoy-java/tree/v0.4.2 ping @yonromai
The reason? When this was originally written, annoy was a python library and wasn't factored into a reusable C++ library, and, I don't know, I kind of wanted to prove it could be done in pure Java because @erikbern said it couldn't. :)
The java implementation has worked fine for a while, although it's getting annoying to keep java's codebase aligned with the C++ one. (poor pun intended..) The plan is indeed to move to a native binding solution, although there might be some problems with JNI's GPL license.
Hi,
is there any reason why you guys are rewriting the code in java instead of using JNA as it has been done for annoy4s?