Closed klaraward closed 3 years ago
Can't decide if we should go for removing "-ea" or "-.*" ?
good question - I wonder if using Runtime.Version.parse(String)
would be easier / more future-proof, but it seems like that class was only added in version 9
Merging #168 (6448bff) into master (b96a163) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #168 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 85.08% 85.10% +0.01%
Complexity 227 227
============================================
Files 23 23
Lines 845 846 +1
Branches 100 100
============================================
+ Hits 719 720 +1
Misses 90 90
Partials 36 36
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...n/java/com/spotify/missinglink/ArtifactLoader.java | 81.08% <100.00%> (+0.25%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b96a163...6448bff. Read the comment docs.
Can't decide if we should go for removing "-ea" or "-.*" ?
good question - I wonder if using
Runtime.Version.parse(String)
would be easier / more future-proof, but it seems like that class was only added in version 9
Parsing Java versions is always fun :D
@klaraward 0.2.4
with this should be available
Can't decide if we should go for removing "-ea" or "-.*" ?