Open alexander-riss opened 4 months ago
Hey @alexander-riss, thanks for pointing this out! We originally didn't really intend for voyager to be used as a standalone C++ library because we want to ensure that we can change the underlying implementation easily. But there's no reason we shouldn't allow for c++ lib usage if people are willing to build it from source.
We've discussed that we will make this change, but with the caveat that we don't guarantee compatibility of the C++ interface between versions.
That sounds great! this will enable a lot of new on-device workflows!
if one wanted to only use the cpp part of voyager, it would be a problem as some of the header files are not using a voyager specific namespace like e.g.
spotify::voyager
to avoid name collitions if used in a broader context and are instead in the default namespace.