Closed jrudolph closed 6 years ago
Just figured we rejected almost the same change several times in #219 and #216. By now we have mima checks so we can actually verify that it's binary compatible. As stated above it actually is because ClassManifest
is an alias to ClassTag
which isn't reflected in any way in the class files. It is also source compatible for the same reason.
I'd suggest to merge this one after verification (just because it's rebased and uses slightly more elegant classTag
instead of implicitly[ClassTag]
.
I fixed up #219, so we can use that one.
Binary compatible because
ClassManifest
is an alias toClassTag
since its inception.Fixes #215.