Fixed the Java example of the jwtDecoder function. The parameter called jwtProcessor was received in the function, but in the function body and referenced the name processor, which is non-existent. The parameter in the method body has been changed to jwtProcessor to match the received parameter.
This is a small correction, but I believe it optimizes the use of the example. :grin:
Fixed the Java example of the jwtDecoder function. The parameter called jwtProcessor was received in the function, but in the function body and referenced the name processor, which is non-existent. The parameter in the method body has been changed to jwtProcessor to match the received parameter.
This is a small correction, but I believe it optimizes the use of the example. :grin: